The Portugal Post Logo

Penajoia family in Almada granted shelter until Jan. 2026 amid custody risk

National News,  Politics
Rubble of a demolished self-built house on a muddy hillside in Almada
By The Portugal Post, The Portugal Post
Published Loading...

Weeks after torrential rains forced the demolition of a self-built home in Penajoia, Almada, the family that lost everything—parents in their 30s and three young children—has gained a narrow reprieve. Social services have extended their stay in a modest pension until 5 January 2026, but the clock keeps ticking: if a permanent roof is not secured by then, officials warned that the children could be placed in protective care. The episode has become a lightning-rod for Portugal’s wider housing debate, exposing the thin line between emergency relief and family fragmentation.

Flash Points – What Matters Most

Temporary shelter funded through Santa Casa da Misericórdia now lasts less than two weeks.

Parents were allegedly told that child removal was on the table if housing is not found.

Activists from Vida Justa brand the threat "illegal coercion" and press for public rehousing.

Almada municipality says it is acting within the law and blames a national housing shortage.

The case highlights Portugal’s record 14,476 homeless citizens and 30 000+ metropolitan families on waiting lists.

From Collapse to Uncertainty

The family’s single-storey dwelling, erected on land owned by the Institute for Housing and Urban Rehabilitation (IHRU), crumbled on 8 December after a hillside slipped under relentless rain. Civil protection considered the structure "imminently unsafe" and ordered demolition within hours. With nowhere to go, the household was booked into a seafront pension for three nights, a common stop-gap measure in Almada. "We packed what we could in ten minutes," the mother recalls, still wearing donated clothes.

The Clock Is Ticking

Last Friday, municipal social workers agreed to stretch the stay until Twelfth Night, but they also handed over a list of private rentals the parents must try to secure. According to Vida Justa, the document came with a verbal warning: failure to comply could trigger child-protection intervention. Portuguese law allows a court to remove minors only when their safety is at risk, yet activists argue "lack of public housing cannot be construed as parental neglect." The Council for the Protection of Children and Young People in Almada declined to comment on individual cases, citing confidentiality.

Agencies Defend Their Roles

Almada’s vice-president for social policy, Carla Antunes, stresses that the municipality "is not abandoning anyone". She points to cooperation with Santa Casa, police, and IHRU in mapping empty flats and reviewing rent caps. Meanwhile, IHRU insists the wider Penajoia redevelopment—600 units of affordable housing financed by the Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRR)—will break ground later in 2026. For the displaced, those timelines feel remote. Local residents’ leader Paulo Santos notes that this is the second Penajoia family in a month facing potential custody threats: "It’s becoming a pattern instead of an exception."

Parents Fear, Children Tremble

Child-psychology experts warn that the mere prospect of separation can inflict trauma. "Uncertainty about a home is toxic stress; the possibility of losing parents multiplies it," says clinical psychologist Ana Teixeira. Studies show housing instability correlates with anxiety, lower school performance, and depression in minors. Portugal registers comparatively high rates of institutionalised children—95% of youngsters in the protection system live in group homes, far above the European average. Reducing those numbers is a stated goal of the 2025-2030 National Strategy for Homelessness and Child Welfare.

Housing Crisis Beyond Penajoia

The episode lands amid a broader squeeze: bank data suggest Portugal built 14 000 fewer homes than households formed each year from 2021 to 2024, while 250 000 dwellings sit empty. Rents in Greater Lisbon climbed 36% since 2020, outpacing wages. Setúbal and Évora join Lisbon in accounting for nearly half of child-protection cases linked to inadequate housing. Critics say local governments rely too heavily on short-term pension stays, "outsourcing" what should be a right guaranteed by the Constitution’s Article 65 and the Basic Housing Law (83/2019).

What Happens Next?

City hall promises weekly check-ins with the Penajoia parents, while Vida Justa plans a vigil outside Almada’s council chambers on 28 December. Should the family fail to land a rental, advocates will demand an emergency lease in municipal stock, arguing that vacant public flats exist. National lawmakers are also revisiting a bill to bar courts from separating children exclusively due to poverty or housing status, a move that could redefine future interventions.

Where to Seek Help

Families in similar distress can tap several support channels:

Social Security’s emergency grants for temporary rent and basic needs.

The Tarifa Social de Energia, trimming utility bills for low-income households.

Local councils’ "Cartão Social" food allowances, now accepted at major supermarkets.

Legal advice via the Portuguese Bar Association’s pro-bono network.

Mental-health hotlines offered by SNS24 and NGOs such as SOS Voz Amiga.

Experts remind residents that requesting aid does not automatically trigger child-protection scrutiny; withholding information often does. For the Penajoia family, navigating that fine print over the next ten days could spell the difference between regrouping under one roof—or facing the New Year apart.